From Technology Review, hat tip Andrew Sullivan: here. Bottom-line, the “complexity brake” will arrest our acceleration towards Kurzweil’s Singularity.
And the argument has as its basis, the complexity problem as far as a general theory of neuroscience is concerned.
Since I don’t share Kurzweil’s rosy vision of his Singularity, I’m pleased. In addition, this should keep us neuroscientists employed well into the future.
The NY Times’ John Markoff sees AI as emerging from its “caution flag” state that it entered in the mid-1980’s.
Money quote for Krasnow Institute colleagues:
“I see the debate over whether we should build these artificial intellects as becoming the dominant political question of the century,” said Hugo de Garis, an Australian artificial-intelligence researcher, who has written a book, “The Artilect War,” that argues that the debate is likely to end in global war.
Aamodt and Wang, guest-blogging, at Olivia Judson see energy consumption as a fly-in-the-ointment for the Singularity.
I’m not so sure–depends on whether there is something similar to Moore’s Law that may be emerging for energy efficiency in computation–to whit, the new Intel Xeon 5500 chip